FDIC finalizes official signs for insured institutions, in hint to crypto firms

Starting in 2025, institutions insured by the FDIC will be required to display a black and navy blue sign on all websites and apps, brick-and-mortar bank locations and certain ATMs.
Starting in 2025, institutions insured by the FDIC will be required to display a black and navy blue sign on all websites and apps, brick-and-mortar bank locations and certain ATMs.

The Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (FDIC) of the United States adopted a rule governing the use of its official signs and advertising in a move that could affect the public perception of certain crypto firms.

In a Dec. 20 announcement, the FDIC said its board of directors had finalized regulations clarifying “false advertising, misrepresentations of deposit insurance coverage, and misuse of the FDIC’s name or logo.” Rather than its gold and black sign introduced in the 1930s, institutions insured by the FDIC will be required to display a black and navy blue sign on all websites and apps, brick-and-mortar bank locations and certain ATMs starting in 2025.

Official FDIC sign starting in 2025. Source: FDIC

According to the FDIC, the last significant update of its sign and advertising rules was in 2006. The government corporation clarified that the updated rule aimed to address entities potentially misleading customers that their funds were FDIC-insured.

“While the rule finalized today isn’t limited to the crypto industry, abuse by crypto has been rampant, forcing the FDIC to take multiple actions to stop it,” said Dennis Kelleher, president and CEO and of nonprofit organization Better Markets. “Investors were misled by Gemini Earn, FTX US, Voyager Digital, and other crypto firms into believing their investments were FDIC insured. We applaud the FDIC’s action to update and strengthen the rules to address this misconduct.”

Related: Crypto adoption: How FDIC insurance could bring Bitcoin to the masses

In 2023, several banks with ties to crypto firms collapsed, were shuttered by authorities or voluntarily liquidated, leading to discussions among lawmakers regarding protecting user funds. The FDIC worked with the New York State Department of Financial Service to close Signature Bank.

Silicon Valley Bank collapsed in March and held deposits from stablecoin issuer Circle and venture capital firm Sequoia Capital, protected under the FDIC. In most situations, the FDIC insures up to $250,000 per depositor.

In June, the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau warned that payment apps allowing crypto transactions may not necessarily be FDIC-insured, putting funds at risk. The FDIC has also referred to crypto activities as “novel and complex risks” to U.S. banks, given their uncertain legal and regulatory status.

Magazine: Unstablecoins: Depegging, bank runs and other risks loom